What Happened to Ducky??

27 05 2008

Ducky just decided to fade away into the unknown. The blog was pulled, the photos were pulled. The account wiped clean. Even the email no longer works.

Why??

Did ducky feel like all the work was done in bringing Heidi down??

Did Ducky get cold feet??

We will probably never know why they decided to pack it in. Our many questions will most likely go unanswered.

I may ruffle a few feathers but I’ve got to say my piece here. Many of us have busted our rear ends doing things to further tighten the noose on ol’ Heidi, adding one more nail in the coffin. Does Ducky not realize how much valuable information was lost when they decided to pull the blog. Or do they just not care any more.

I fully understand possible activist burnout. I’ve hit the wall many times over the years in the fight for various causes. But I never just gave up. Deleting the blog was childish in my opinion. If they weren’t interested in the fight anymore it would have been very easy just to leave the blog dormant or pass it on to someone who would use it.

Were they afraid someone may find out their identity??

I say so what.

The fight is long from being over with. The truth STILL needs to be told. Oh yeah….one more thing to say…..

WE AIN’T DONE YET





Let’s Review Important Information

5 10 2007

Since July we’ve posted about the dangers of the Kimkins diet and the deceptions used in selling it.

For those just tuning in, please take a few moments to read some of our most important posts:

Information about the class action lawsuit is available here.

Information about requesting refunds at PayPal is available here.

A summary of the controversy is available on Wikipedia. (Wiki deleted the article)

UPDATE: Ducky is taking the weekend off to spend time with family and friends. For those new to our blog, please take some time this weekend to read our posts and understand why we feel it is important the truth about Kimkins and Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) be exposed. For those continuing along and keeping up, we’ll be back on Monday and hope you’ll take a breather this weekend too to relax and have some fun!

We will be moderating comments over the weekend, so if you leave a comment, it will be in the queue until we get to it as we have time throughout the weekend.

27 comments

Comments feed for this article

October 5, 2007 at 2:06 pm

Let’s Review Important Information by diet.MEDtrials.info

[...] continues at Just Ducky brought to you by diet.medtrials.info and [...]

October 5, 2007 at 2:28 pm

McLurkypants

After some back & forth over deletion attempts, I’ve gotten an article to stick on Wikipedia – all familiar with Wikipedia editing should feel free to hop over there and contribute! Kimkins Controversy on Wikipedia.

October 5, 2007 at 2:51 pm

Ducky Does a Recap « Kimkins Scam

[...] Let’s Review Important Information « Kimkins Exposed [...]

October 5, 2007 at 2:58 pm

BamaGal

Here is something else that needs addressing, the Ezine articles. I did a couple of blog posts about it. I still have not received any info from them. But they have addressed it in their own blog. Check out these links.

Ezine Articles « Kimkins Scam

EzineArticles Blog » Battles We Did Not Ask For

October 5, 2007 at 3:07 pm

captivated

mclurkypants – that is beautiful!

i can’t stop watching this story unfold. it’s like the OJ trial!

October 5, 2007 at 11:12 pm

Cryssi

*********for ducky**********

This was made by Gina for you over at LCF. These are the new badges we’re all sporting in leiu of the rubber ducks.

http://www.lowcarbfriends.com/bbs/9311882-post872.html

October 6, 2007 at 2:07 am

Susan

Looks like the Wiki article is down. I was really hoping to check it out, too!
Did anyone copy the Wiki article anywhere that can be read now?

October 6, 2007 at 2:58 am

Kimmer Is Busted

http://www.behappy2day.com/girls_info.php?i=6077&f=1

October 6, 2007 at 3:02 am

kim

Dude, go to LCF, they found the red dress.

October 6, 2007 at 3:02 am

Let’s Review Important Information by diet.MEDtrials.info

[...] continues at Just Ducky brought to you by diet.medtrials.info and [...]

October 6, 2007 at 3:07 am

kkatastrophediet

http://www.behappy2day.com/girls_info.php?i=6077&f=1

red dress alert!

October 6, 2007 at 3:12 am

HoneyBee

The big fake picture source was found…Kimmer in the red dress goes by the name Lesya http://www.behappy2day.com/girls_info.php?i=6077&f=1

October 6, 2007 at 3:47 am

Concerned about kimkins

Ducky Wake the hell up!!!!

http://www.behappy2day.com/girls_info.php?i=6077&f=1

October 6, 2007 at 3:53 am

BamaGal

The lady in the red dress as been found!!!

http://www.behappy2day.com/girls_info.php?i=6077&f=1

October 6, 2007 at 5:34 am

Laura

Here’s the Lady in Red:

Lesya

http://www.behappy2day.com/girls_info.php?i=6077&f=1

http://www.behappy2day.com/girls_info.php?i=6077&f=2

October 6, 2007 at 5:47 am

McLurkypants

Have you heard that the RED DRESS photo Kimmer presented as hers has been found on one of those Russian mail order bride sites by a woman named “Buzzybee” at LCF??

HERE she is!

October 6, 2007 at 5:48 am

McLurkypants

OK I don’t know if that link works?

http://www.behappy2day.com/girls_info.php?i=6077&f=1

October 6, 2007 at 8:30 am

Princess Dieter

The Red Dress has been found. :) And Ducky missed it. Dang, Ducky.

But I’m sure by Monday, when you return, there will be all sorts of new reports about the Kimtanic.

Happy Weekend All. I feel sooooo good about that pic being found. YES!

The Princess

October 6, 2007 at 1:02 pm

Susan

Hmm, my post of last night is gone… Anyway, I had posted that the Wiki article is down. Anyone have a copy posted elsewhere that we can read?

October 6, 2007 at 1:13 pm

Princess Dieter

Yeah, it supersucks that they deleted it. McLurky had done a great job, lots of good links. I hope it’s reinstated.

The Princess

October 6, 2007 at 2:14 pm

Susan

PD, I know – I hope to see the Wiki article soon.
McLurky, any chance you kept a copy?
Wow! I wake up this morning to a Blizzard of Red Dresses! This is great.

October 6, 2007 at 3:11 pm

thatgirl

I can’t get into LCF right now. Grrrr. Internet page cannot be displyed. I wonder if Heidi was letting Brandon out his hacker hat on again.

October 6, 2007 at 4:42 pm

Susan

Yep, LCF boards appear to be down. I was able to go to LCD and to the main board page, but was unable to access specific links such as Stillmans etc.

Can’t wait to see what Darth Kimmer still has up her sleeve.

My prediction is her next spin will be to play her sympathy card. She will take a page from the Paris / Brittney playbook.

October 7, 2007 at 2:13 am

McLurkypants

Susan & Ducky, I am having to go thru the challenge procedure on Wikipedia (AGAIN). I have the support of the admins who deleted it the first time I put it up – we shall see what happens.

I AM SO PISSED that I didn’t save a copy of it! Others had gone on and edited & added so much stuff, it was really growing. I hope it will come back – I’ll spread the word when it does. Glad you appreciated it!

October 8, 2007 at 3:10 pm

theTRUTH

This is for the California attorney generals consumer complaint form.

http://ag.ca.gov/contact/complaint_form.php?cmplt=CL

December 27, 2007 at 4:57 pm

katinsac

Friends don’t let friends do Kimkins! Remember that cover girl on the WW Mag? Well, she learned the hard way about Kimkins and it’s dangers!! Read her blog and decide for yourself.

http://the-journey-on.blogspot.com/

December 27, 2007 at 9:43 pm

katinsac

Now that you know the Truth…Join the Lawsuit!!

http://kimkinslawsuit.wordpress.com/





The Psychic Predicts…

27 09 2007

It’s starting off a banner day in the speculation department as to whom Ducky is.

First Tippytoes is sure we’re admins and members from Low Carb Friends. Now, theTRUTH posted private messages between SingingLass and Kimmer, with SingingLass offering her insights about who we are.

Oh, it doesn’t get any better than this!

SingingLass wrote:

http://kimkinsexposed.wordpress.com/

Thats the fun stuff. I keep the kimkins site open in my IE browser, and when I go to any of those sites or LCF, I do so seperately through aol, fav places etc…so that they cannot see a browsing trail. I use a statistical traffic counter thingy on my listings myself. Someone must have linked some peeps from the chat room yesterday though, or at least so ducky claimed. I had actually wondered if you had peeked at it last night because someone announomously posted ” all of a dozen of you” on that. I have posted a couple times on the boards under different names just wanting to try to point out holes, its pretty pointless though, they don’t want to hear anything that bursts their obsession bubble. Ducky is definately grasping for straws though…most likely Catherine’s husband, prolly wanted to set up a couple different slam sites to try to broaden the appearance of the scope and people against you.

I also am not surprised no one has contacted you, its why I have laughed at them calling everyone, their silly petitions. Firstly, those kind of investigations tend to start with an undercover preliminary peeksie. Meaning they would have some underling at first poke their head in here to see if there is any kind of story or truth, no one wants to make a foll of themselves by running with something that is not solid…..and what they will find is not what is being spread around. People get what they pay for, no advice being given for people to eat nothing but grass…..and no where in the purchasing agreement does it say that people are entitled to know your bra size or choice of toilet paper. In order to have a real case, there would have to be huge lackings in what was promised, people paying and getting nothing and the like….and also there would have to be multiple medically documented cases of people being hurt or worse, and even then only if they followed the diet correctly and it happened. Also, any self-thinking investigator who goes and looks at that LCF thread and the ducky board will be able to see it is a foaming irrational mob behind this.

I had someone saying she was eating 10-15 g of fat a day in the chat room and not losing weight. I of course told her to up that, and she was like “oooh”……there also was someone who had been silently sitting in the chat room for a long time last night…bracken666 i think it was, who thought they have had an account since june, had no posts listed in their profile. I decided to address them and say hello, and bam, they signed out. Others said he/she had been in there for hours without saying anything, so just seemed odd they ran when addressed…obviously was watching. Just little things and people like that to keep an eye out, sad we have to, but needed right now I guess.

Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) replied:

Thanks, Del, you’re better than the FBI.

Everything you outlined for an investigation is exactly right — but I wasn’t going to bore you with the details, LOL! I’m glad you understand and you see yourself that there’s nothing hokey going on: diet, food list, support groups and nobody being told to drink Drano or gulp laxatives.

I did get an email from the Woman’s World editor. Wanted to know if we were sending mailings to members encouraging laxative abuse. Had to set her straight on what’s happening. Ducky is running out of resources — and every morning we’re still here darn it!

BTW, this probably sounds like a bribe (hey, you can blog about it!) but I appreciate you looking out for Kimkins. I’ll remember that. I believe a gift between friends is non-taxable, yes? You’ll have something to look forward to at Christmas. (theTRUTH emphasis added)

17 comments

Comments feed for this article

September 27, 2007 at 6:18 pm

Kim

How paranoid are they? Someone is “lurking” and then leaves when addressed? How does the psychic not know the “lurker” wasn’t someone watching to gather info for their investigation?

September 27, 2007 at 6:25 pm

The Psychic Predicts… by diet.MEDtrials.info

[...] continues at Just Ducky brought to you by diet.medtrials.info and [...]

September 27, 2007 at 6:28 pm

Dottie

“Firstly, those kind of investigations tend to start with an undercover preliminary peeksie.”

You know, there really IS a reson why it’s called “undercover”. lol…

Conspiracy occurs when there is the specific intent that a crime be performed; and there is an agreement with another person to engage in or cause that crime to be performed, and one of the conspirators commits an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. At state and local levels, there are various degrees of conspiracy, ranging from misdemeanors to felonies, depending upon the crime that is committed. Under U.S. federal law, conspiracy is a felony.

September 27, 2007 at 6:34 pm

Concerned about kimkins

Or a person who is too shy to join or talk about their weight problem but wants to get info. What the hell?

September 27, 2007 at 6:45 pm

losingjusme

oohhhh … what’s Hidy going to send SL? A matching set of her ’striped’ PJ’s from jail?

September 27, 2007 at 6:51 pm

Princess Dieter

She’s a psychic. Why doesn’t she already know who Ducky is and who the lurker was and what Heidi’s bra size is. (50FF?) Ahem.

The Princess

September 27, 2007 at 7:05 pm

trudy

They’re wrong.

Ducky = RightNow = PJ

September 27, 2007 at 7:10 pm

Concerned about kimkins

Because much like a her claim of being a diet expert, she is NOT a psychic. Remember when Ms. Cleo got arrested for being a fraud, uh…a psychic would have seen that comin’. Plus, seeing her pics, she is also not at her goal, at all. So, um…yeah Heidi, please let the blind lead the blind. I know I’ve always wanted to go to Michael Jackson for Parenting tips. Shit!

September 27, 2007 at 7:46 pm

sheridan

“Firstly, those kind of investigations tend to start with an undercover preliminary peeksie. Meaning they would have some underling at first poke their head in here to see if there is any kind of story”

What makes you think one or more of your new members *aren’t* working undercover for an agency? :-)

September 27, 2007 at 7:47 pm

The Psychic Predicts… by diet.MEDtrials.info

[...] continues at Just Ducky brought to you by diet.medtrials.info and [...]

September 27, 2007 at 10:16 pm

Princess Dieter

Excuse me, but how is a psychic worth $600 bucks an hour ($10 dollars A MINUTE). Teachers, nurses, plumbers, nutritionists, construction workers, dentists, etc –ie, real jobs—do not make this. Heck, my roofer didn’t make that and roofers are in big demand post hurricanes down here in Florida. Not even doctors make that, and maybe not lawyers (I haven’t hired any, so dunno).

But Singing”I’m just here to help people”Lass thinks it is right and just and fair to charge SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS AN HOUR for readings. Yeah, she’s in it for the empathic love…

http://www.kasamba.com/psychicmagicsong/

No wonder she and Heidi get along so well. Online money-grubbers banding together….

The Princess

September 27, 2007 at 10:35 pm

CR

I think they are all chuggin off the same jug LMAO.

September 27, 2007 at 10:56 pm

antikimkins

Interesting that SingingLass claims to have two degrees but her ass can’t spell!!!! Where did she get those degrees????? AsSeenOnTV.com????

Since we know that WW editor has contacted Kimmer with her concern — I say we all contact that editor AGAIN.

September 28, 2007 at 12:15 am

scoble

Hmmmm…opera singer, psychis, lawyer and NOW FBI/CIA/Police investigator!!! Is there no end to the list of qualifications this girl has???? Amazing!!! And she has never heard of spell check??? Hmmmm?

September 28, 2007 at 12:16 am

scoble

I meant psychic…..I HAVE heard of spell check! LOL

September 28, 2007 at 5:00 am

Mimi

Actually, we don’t “know” that the WW editor has contacted Kimmer. All we know is, Kimmer says the WW editor contacted Kimmer.

September 28, 2007 at 7:08 am

Princess Dieter

I did write the editor of WW with links to here and Christin and TRUTH and etc. I was a mite ticked, too, and forgot to proofread. Left in a couple of typos. I hope they don’t think I’m Tippy or SingingLass. Heh.

So, I guess this won’t be over until the Psychic…stops singing?

The Princess





CASA Needs Woman’s World Article

15 09 2007

We’ve been asked to let readers know that Barbara Hofman at the Riverside Satellite office of CASA is seeking a copy of the June 12 article Better than Gastric Bypass, published in Woman’s World.

Anyone with a copy of this article, please fax it to Barbara Hofman at (951) 358-4302.

You may call her with additional information at (951) 358-4305.

Thank you!

15 comments

Comments feed for this article

September 15, 2007 at 3:56 pm

Healthy LCer

I sent this at 10:50 Saturday morning..I think it went okay, but we have an older fax machine. Someone might want to resend it just in case..

September 16, 2007 at 3:13 am

Lisa

Just wondering how much good it’ll do them since the article was run with a fake name (Kim Drake) and a fake pic?

September 16, 2007 at 2:40 pm

ban kimmer

Why are you doing this? Can’t you see Tippy Toes stands behind Heidi 100%. You see even if Heidi doesn’t have foster children it doesn’t matter to Tippy because she’s making money off of the suckers on the net. I have NO NO NO respect for Tippy and I think she should be in jail with Heidi. Here’s her post from LCF..tell me if this sounds like an innocent person…

“OK, just to answer the question, when we did the fund raiser we were a small group and we pledged a dollar per pound lost for a month. It was not a significant amount of money. We all understood the money would go to Kimmer to do as she saw fit and it was paid individually thru paypal. ”

How is that not a crime?

September 16, 2007 at 2:44 pm

ban kimmer

oh and the why are you doing this was a total joke btw hehe ;)

September 16, 2007 at 6:12 pm

greegreeyaya

ban kimmer, Exactly! Tippy is paving her road right along side Kimmer straight to jail!

I am impressed with the continuous amounts of info the commentators are revealing on the ‘Getting to know Tippy’ page:

http://kimkinsexposed.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/getting-to-know-tippy-toes/#comments

It is so nice to be able to express the truth here without worrying about being banned or edited or having our posts deleted or getting warned like we are at Heidi’s site or LCF.

Thanks Ducky!

September 16, 2007 at 7:16 pm

anonymous

Is it possible that there is more than one scammer in this world?

More than one person who has no conscience?

More than one person who is engaged in mail fraud?

Is it possible that Jeannie “Tippytoes” Baitinger is quite happily enjoying her business relationship with Heidi “Kimmer” Diaz, and that their plans for fake fundraisers don’t cause EITHER of them to lose one moments’ sleep?

There have been comments, here and there, about “Poor Tippytoes!” Comments about how she’s been “used” by Kimmer. Comments about how Kimmer is “playing” her.

Like there couldn’t possibly be TWO scammers pulling the strings at Kimkins.com.

September 16, 2007 at 9:09 pm

ban kimmer

I totally agree anon. There has to be. She has been on LCF today defending herself, but she has not answered any of the important questions. She hasn’t made any sense either. She’s been a right idiot. It’s sad really. She now deserves everything coming her way!!!!

September 16, 2007 at 10:31 pm

Watcher

I’ve been watching Tippy defend herself at LCF. She tries the diversionary tactic , but doesn’t pull it off. She has incriminated herself the same as Heidi by misquoting what she said, when the WRITTEN posts are in the Archives. Nor does she give a hoot for anybody joining the site because of her amazing 112 lb loss on Kimkins. However, Cuties called her on the fact that, other than one 30 day Challenge, Tippy has stuck to Kimkins at most for one solid week before rotating back to Atkins. So, although her weight loss is real, Tippy is perpetuating the “success” of Kimkins to lure in new subscribers. IOW, she’s joined the Fraud Squad!

September 17, 2007 at 10:01 am

another curious onlooker

how many days left on the countdown clock?

September 17, 2007 at 10:52 am

On the side lines

Ducky, I did not know how to contact you so I will post this in the comments section. I don’t know if you approve comments before they go up if so You don’t have to post this but please look into this.

I have been watching this kimkins thing from the side lines and feel sorry for all those duped by this woman. At any rate I was over at KimKins and I wasw looking to see if she changed anything. Well down under terms and conditions I read this and I never rememeber reading this before.

http://www.kimkins.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=786&Itemid=39

“SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION FOR ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE IN AN APPROPRIATE STATE OR FEDERAL COURT LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE PARTIES UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVE THEIR RESPECTIVE RIGHTS TO A JURY TRIAL. ”

Is this new as Ibelieve it is? And is she putting this here to try and scare people away from sueing her because they may have to travel to LA to sue her. And what is she afraid a jury trial will find her guilty.

Anyways I hope you or someone look into this.

————————–

Considering that no one can waive rights prior to potential invoking of rights, this is a moot inclusion in the Kimkins TOS.

September 17, 2007 at 12:24 pm

ban kimmer

Well it looks like Heidi has been doing her google research on how to deflect again. Hehe. Too bad she isn’t a lawyer and never played one on tv.

BTW You should bring the Tippy Toes post back up to the top so we can debate what a sleazeball she is again. She deserves to be in the hotseat as she refuses to answer any of the important questions on lcf. What a snake!

September 17, 2007 at 1:37 pm

Kim

I am going to chime in on the jurisdiction issue….Heidi is doing business in all 50 states as well as outside of the U.S. This automatically gives federal jurisdiction in all 50 states so she can be sued in any federal court in the country. It does not matter what she tries to put in her TOS the law is the law and contrary to what Heidi believes, she is not above it.

September 17, 2007 at 4:00 pm

too bad kimmer

I agree that Tippy’s pants are on fire.

September 17, 2007 at 4:12 pm

Down with Kimkins!

I would like to comment on something that Kimmer/Heidi/Kim Drake stated awhile ago. She claimed, as did an affliate, that Jesica Alba was on KimKins. Well……..my husband works in the movie biz and happened to work on a movie quite recently with JA and so I was curious as to what she ate so I asked DH to glance at what she took from Craft Foodservice. Craft FoodService is a caterring company that sets up a tent on site and serves a mass array of food buffet style. Cast and crew get served from one tent and extras go to another tent. He was part of the cast and crew. Lets just say that she IS. NOT. FOLLOWING. KIMKINS!!!

I know that this is an old point to debate but it has bothered me. Some young people are so impressionable and this just really ticked me off!

September 17, 2007 at 5:23 pm

theTRUTH

I have a new blog. So far I have just captured comments from new admins, but you can read it here:

http://thetruthinhiding.blogspot.com/





Getting to Know Tippy Toes

11 09 2007

One of the newest admins at Kimkins is Jeannie Baitinger, aka ‘Tippy Toes’ in the Kimkins forums and Low Carb Friends forums. For the purpose of keeping things simple here, we’ll refer to her as ‘Tippy’ throughout.

Tippy joined Low Carb Friends back in April 2004 when she started a low carbohydrate diet (Atkins) and weighed 263 pounds. Since that time she’s admittedly struggled to lose the weight desired and declared herself at goal on September 8, 2006 after losing 100 pounds. In the last year she’s maintained her weight between 150 and 155 pounds, alternating between Atkins and Kimkins. Why we make this an issue is that she recently wrote a positive 5 star review at the BBB for Kimkins, on September 7, 2007,

This is the BEST weight loss website I have been to yet! Thanks to Kimkins.com I have lost 112 lbs, have never been sick, got off blood pressure and cholesterol meds and I feel terrific! I have NEVER experienced anything but positive help from the site and I was NEVER told to use laxitives OR lower calories–ever.I cannot say enough good things about the website. I tried other weight loss plans and they did not work but that Kimkins sure did! And I have medical records and pictures to prove it. Just ask me for them.

Within the Low Carb Friends postings she’s made, it’s clear she did not follow Kimkins exclusively.
In fact, through her own posts at Low Carb Friends, we learn she lost 47 pounds following Atkins, stalled for six months, moved to South Beach, then Eat Fat Get Thin, then a Fruit Rotation regiment, then Kimkins, and then finally a rotation of Atkins and Kimkins.

Yet, in the above review she attributes her entire weight loss to Kimkins. This may well be because she was the featured weight loss success recently in the Kimkins newsletter (issue 20). In that feature she states she started with Atkins and then found Kimkins when her weight loss stalled, she was frustrated and “starving and felt terrible…I was desperate.” In that feature she also willingly states she alternates between Kimkins and Atkins. This fact is curious given Kimmer’s (Heidi Diaz) disdain for Atkins and its allowance for higher fat meats and dairy. When we review the situation, it is clearer why Kimmer is open to Tippy saying many of the things she does in her success story. Kimmer is losing staff left and right and needs to replace staffers fleeing her company and site. She knows one thing about Tippy, and that’s her long standing desire to be an Admin at Low Carb Friends, a position she is now more than willing to extend to Tippy now that she, Kimmer, is desperate.We recently learned that over the years Tippy has long desired a position of Admin at Low Carb Friends and has made this desire known to many close to her, including Kimmer prior to her departure from that forum.

Last year Tippy stirred up things on a weight loss challenge thread on Low Carb Friends by being very critical of the Low Carb Friends admins at the time. She made it known she believed she was qualified to be an Admin and when a position as one was not offered, she started passing along private information about the Low Carb Friends admins behind the scenes in emails and Private Messages in an attempt to turn them on each other. In those communications we are told she alluded to questionable behavior by the Low Carb Friends Admins at a pig roast in Tennessee she attended, allegations we will not detail here, but suffice to say included implications of inpropriety between Admins whom were not married to each other.

An attention junkie like Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) she spent months attempting to garner a position of Admin within Low Carb Friends to no avail, but her desire to be one continued.

As soon as Kimmer offered an Admin position to Tippy, she jumped at it and quickly told her friends, expressing her delight at the opportunity. We’re told she said she was thrilled by the “authority” Kimmer entrusted her with and also expressed a grand plan to completely revamp the Kimkins diet plans into something she believed would be healthier and much less objectionable to those concerned over the safety of the plans as currently written.

May we remind her she need only look as far as Becky to see such changes will not be tolerated by Kimmer. Read Becky’s Reasonable Appeal to make changes and Kimmer’s reply point by point.

What is more disturbing than her less than accurate BBB review however, is that she’s taken to doing Kimmer’s biding on Low Carb Friends. In a very recent post there, she laid the groundwork to instill doubts in the minds of those concerned about Kimkins and Kimmer by questioning not only the motivation of those engaging on the Facination thread, but also attempted to lay blame for the entire situation on one individual, former business partner Catherine (whose husband is releasing details of that partnership at Slamboard).

Her post, titled Are We Being Used, includes the following,

Just a thought. Notice the person who started this thread is a junior member (meaning newly registered) and does not continue to post? Notice so many junior members coming in now? It is easy to assume they are from Kimkins site BUT I wonder about the truth in that assumption for many reasons. One, I recall Catherine telling X LCF members how easily identity can change so they could come back without admins knowing it was them… Cutie–remember that? Two, I notice the junior members seem computer savvy enough to post info and pics I would not have a clue about myself… Now I am not saying every single junior member here is ficticious. But I think many may be. Tom, can you check out this possibility?Is it possible this whole thing has been created by the ex biz partner, who is clearly mad as heck? Also, keep in mind it is the same creator of slamboards and…perhaps Ducky? Oddly enough, Catherine admits it was her idea to start a website for Kimkins–not Kimmers. So I don’t think Kimmer spent countless hours here plotting but I think Catherine did. Also, Catherine just thought Kimkins was a wonderful plan and fully endorsed and followed it, according to her. Until the partnership disolved, that is. Now it can kill you…WTH?

And the Kimkins survivors blogs… Are they real? How do we know? And the 14 year old–was that real?
The threats to anyone who is a moderator for her site–threats of fraud and lawsuits… A bully tactic for sure to intimidate them into walking out. The claims of KimATC being 50 lbs over weight…How rude was that, asking her how that Kimkins diet was working out? In fact, that statement points that Kimkins doesn’t work and we have established it does. We all have weight problems which is why we diet. The pressure is on–but by whom? The reasons seem pretty obvious.

Don’t get me wrong. I KNOW there are some of those people here in a genuine manner. I know a couple of you from her site and I know you had concerns (even if you are ALL at goal now thanks to her diet). I do not agree with cutting calories further in the event of a stall either. But perhaps Kimmer was in the learning process herself and it was a bad decision, or mistake. And maybe Kimmer did gain weight back and won’t tell. Take a good look around this site. How many people have gained their weight back and refuse to remove the skinny avitor pics and change stats accordingly? I think many of us are guilty for that.

Are we all puppets on a string being manipulated by a raging X partner?

We know in the past Kimmer has taken to manipulating situations to motivate individuals to do things they might not do on their own. An example of such behaviour in the past is the January 2007 blog by Jimmy Moore, where he attacked Low Carb Friends and did so in a scathing and vicious manner. He’s since retracted that post, but our memory is long here and we’ve been told that Kimmer’s input was indeed the impetus for that post.

It’s interesting that many of the points Tippy brought to her post at Low Carb Friends are now the same points Kimmer is trying deperately to convince her members of within the Kimkins forums. It appears much of Tippy’s post contents were scripted by Kimmer. Tippy seems unaware of the manipulative instincts of Kimmer and may not realize how she too is now being used by her as a means to an end.We ask this, Tippy how could you associate yourself with Kimmer given all the facts now in the public view?

EDITED TO ADD
We’d like to remind readers that this is the same Tippy Toes who organized the fundraiser for Kimmer’s (Heidi Diaz) phantom foster children last summer. Tippy accepted the position of Admin after revelation of the fact Heidi Diaz has no foster children and has not had foster children in her care since at least 2000.





Heidi Diaz Bald?

5 09 2007

Slamboard reported their private investigator told them of observing Heidi Diaz through a window while she was at her computer, and she was sans wig.

She’s BALD!

Oh, Ducky does hope the PI took a picture!

The PI also confirmed that only two people live in the home, Heidi Diaz and her son Brandon.  No foster children.





The Foster Care Kids Challenge, July 2006

5 09 2007

Kimkins Dangers was the first to report that Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) is no longer a CASA, and posted that the Site Manager of the Riverside Satellite for CASA, Barbara Hofman was interested in information about monies collected by Heidi Diaz for her purported foster kids.

The contact information provided was:

Program: Riverside Satellite
Contact Name:
Barbara Hofman, Site Manager
Address:
9991 County Farm Road
City:
Riverside
State:
California
Zip Code:
92503
Phone:
(951) 358-4305

Edited to add email address: BHofman@casariversidecounty.org

Within her Kimkins forums, a challenge was initiated in June to raise money for ‘her kids’ who were supposedly aging out of the foster care system. The challenge was first started by Tippy Toes (an admin now) the following posted to lure members to commit to $1 per pound lost between July 1 and August 1, 2006,

Subject: How about a weight loss challenge to benefit Kimmer’s foster kids?
Author: Tippy Toes (edited to remove “admin” status as it has come to our attention that status is recent)

For those who don’t know this: 100% of Kimmers proceeds are going to help foster kids who turn 18 to get set up with housing, utilities, etc…

So here is my challenge:

Starting July 1st until August 1
Pick any of Kimmers plans you want or whatever works best for you.

Let’s post our start weight. For each pound we lose, plan to donate one dollar for Kimmer’s kids. (Example: If you lost 14 lbs, you owe $14.00.) I’ll get help from the webmaster to set us up with a paypal account at the end.

It’s for a good cause and getting us thinner doing it is almost as good too!

So…who’s in?

Now, not only did members pay to be in the forum, they were being solicited for more money for Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) and it’s clearly suggested that any money sent from the challenge will go for ‘her kids’.

The most important thing here, did Kimmer have foster kids in her care?

It’s been reported that Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) has made statements online to the effect that she was no longer a foster parent when she created a profile at a dating site, which was reported by Slamboard. Based on the information posted at the dating site, the profile was created in 2005 or at the latest, early 2006 (her son’s age was listed as 16, he just recently turned 18).

So, the question begs, did Kimmer knowingly allow collection of funds and then accept them? Based on her response in that thread, it appears she willing accepted that money was going to be collected for ‘her kids’ who may indeed have been phantoms of her imagination!

Subject: Re:How about a weight loss challenge to benefit Kimmer’s foster kids?
Author: Kimmer (Admin)

You know, it’s hard to type with tears in your eyes. How unbelievably generous you guys are!

I wasn’t going to say anything to anybody when the site started. It’s so tacky to talk about money, but I’m not above “tacky-osity” so …

For many years at LCF people asked me about starting my own site or writing a book, but I have a huge problem with making money.

It’s not the making money, per se, because I insist on top dollar when I’m working at a job. If I find out somebody else is making 10 cents an hour more than me for the same job, the whole office is going to hear about it!

I’ve always been weird about money. I almost have an aversion to it. This would explain why I’m not rich.

In my experience, I’ve seen people willing to do extreme or illegal things for money (cousin is a prostitute) and people who think cash buys anything. What even comes to mind are men who invite me to dinner and expect me to sleep with them because they bought me the #2 special at El Tio Pepe. Now, I don’t know what the going rate is for hookers, but I’m guessing it’s more than $8.99 plus tax and tip.

My problem is accepting something in return for helping people. I’ve always been that way. I’ve raised my sons with the same belief … you don’t take money for doing the right thing.

I volunteer with poor people in a local homeless shelter. I write & type their resumes, practice interviews and job applications and wrangle interview clothes to help get them on their feet. I babysit their kids for free. I’ve even bought monthly bus passes for those who do get a job. I’m a volunteer for the literacy program at the library and teach immigrants to read and write. But I’m OK with all of that because I don’t take money for doing it.

What is it with me and money?

As you all know I’m a foster mom. I only take teenage boys, usually 15-18, which is close my own son, 17. They would love for me to take teenage girls, but my heart isn’t strong enough for that stress, LOL … and I’d need a Rottweiler standing guard outside the girls’ room at night!

The boys have to leave when they’re 18. Imagine being a typical 18 year old, making minimum wage at Taco Bell (part time yet!) and having to come up with the stuff you need when you’re starting out. I live in a suburb of Los Angeles and there’s a huge foster population (sometimes it’s the kid, but usually it’s the parent that has the problem).

There are “some” county funds, but not enough for every kid. A few kids come to me just months before they’re forced to emancipate. If you can imagine how slow government works, that’s barely enough time to process the paperwork that they’re in the system, never mind getting $$ together for them to leave.

I couldn’t take money from this site or the book for myself. I just couldn’t, it’s my weird thing. But, if it would let me help my boys with move-in expenses for an apartment, get the electricity turned on, buy a small microwave, a bus pass or a set of towels. Now that’s appealing.

So, apparently I don’t have a problem making money from helping people if I use the money to help others. Bless you all.

Now consider just how devious such a post is, if in fact, Kimmer no longer had foster children in her care! If you, or someone you know, participated in the above challenge and eventually sent Kimmer money, please take a moment to contact Barbara Hofman at the above address and/or phone number.

28 comments

Comments feed for this article

September 5, 2007 at 3:15 pm

Concerned about kimkins

Ok may I ask who the hell besides a complete narcissist would write that long of a post bragging about herself? This “lady” makes me throw up in my mouth.

September 5, 2007 at 3:16 pm

Maggie

It’s disgusting how this woman LIES!

September 5, 2007 at 3:26 pm

ooBoo

“Phantoms of her imagination”….that’s exactly what it is, she doesn’t have foster kids anymore and still plays like she does. I really wish people would see all the lies and get it, this woman is a total fraud! But no, they still cling to her, still desperate to believe the lies.

September 5, 2007 at 3:31 pm

Concerned about kimkins

And the best part of all of it…

I volunteer with poor people in a local homeless shelter. I write & type their resumes, practice interviews and job applications and wrangle interview clothes to help get them on their feet. I babysit their kids for free.

Um…how do you do that dear kimmer? I thought you were agoraphobic? Strange?

September 5, 2007 at 3:32 pm

g

Ducky, I don’t remember Tippy ever being an admin at Kimmers site. But she did indeed start the challenge.

———————-

We have text copies and screenshots of the original posts made on the thread, and next to Tippy Toes name is the designation “Admin”. Perhaps she is no longer an admin, but it appears at the time she had that responsibility.

For anyone wondering, we edited the above post to limit ability of those within Kimkins to identify its author, but wanted to leave the question of whether Tippy Toes was admin status at the time of the thread.

September 5, 2007 at 3:42 pm

Kimkins Dangers

“It’s not the making money, per se, because I insist on top dollar when I’m working at a job. If I find out somebody else is making 10 cents an hour more than me for the same job, the whole office is going to hear about it!

I’ve always been weird about money. I almost have an aversion to it. This would explain why I’m not rich.”

INCREDIBLE considering that she, at that time, is known to have been collecting social security disability (and most likely still is!)

Aversion to money, OH PLEASE. What a hoot. That woman really has no morals.

We have contacted many authorities in CA and have NOT been able to verify that Heidi has had any foster children – at least since 2004. The State of CA Foster Parent Ombudsman office says that anyone found medically disabled and collecting social security disability would be immediately disqualified from the foster parent program.

So she’s either lying about SSI or lying about foster children or both! Who can tell anymore with this nutter!

But please, to reiterate what Ducky has said, PLEASE contact Barbara Hofman if you have any more information about the fundraisers for the “foster children”.

September 5, 2007 at 3:48 pm

ixtapacheryl

Oh my goodness – I never saw that post from Kimmer before. That is just horrible. How could anyone accept the money knowing full well they are deceiving all the generous members. I think it is deplorable! There is a place for people like that. Maybe she feels she didn’t commit fraud because she didn’t ask for the donations in the first place. Thank goodness I didn’t donate. She is pathetic to say the least.

September 5, 2007 at 3:54 pm

Watcher

W/o standing up for Heidi in the slightest, I can see that it was possible for the Kid Challenge to come at the end of her fostering (whether or not Kimmer knew it was the end), and accepting the 1-month’s collection for her most recent fosterlings or her favorites. Moreover, she didn’t initiate it. So fraud would be difficult to prove when voluntary donations are offered. Sort of like Manna from heaven, as the saying goes. She admits to being tacky, and I agree. But tacky isn’t illegal, as far as I know.

—————-

From the information we have seen, it is unlikely she was still a foster parent at the time of the challenge. Even if she was, the foster care program has specific guidelines about money, even donations, for a foster child. If she collected monies, without having any foster children in her care, that is fraud. If she collected monies while a child was in her care, she had specific reporting guidelines to follow, that if she did not, is also fraud. As Kimkins Dangers pointed out, Barbara Hofman wants to know who sent her money and who cashed the checks. We doubt the state CASA agency would be interested in this if they did not believe something was not right.

September 5, 2007 at 3:57 pm

Concerned about kimkins

I too have an aversion to money. Which is why I will now STOP giving free advice on dieting and begin to charge $60 for it. I will also call it Concernedkins or Concerned watchers, or Concernedmans. But I assure you it is not for the money. It’s simply for the “Joy” of helping those less fortunate. ((((pats halo))))

September 5, 2007 at 4:01 pm

Jean

I never believed it, when this, and other ‘fund raisers’ were organized.

Each time, they were made a ’sticky’ at the top of each and every forum.. By or at least with, permission of Heidi. Turned my stomach every time I had to see them.

September 5, 2007 at 4:19 pm

Kim

As a current CASA who does work with foster kids and the family courts, this absolutely turns my stomach! I have had cases with kids in foster homes that are wonderful but then I’ve seen some homes that aren’t the best, but this takes it to a whole different level. I’m hope some people come forward who participated in this and she gets what she deserves.

September 5, 2007 at 4:20 pm

M

Ducky, here is Barbara’s email address at work — it’s publicly posted on the internet, so I’m going to assume it’s okay.

BHofman@casariversidecounty.org

I thought I’d send you this in case you want to add it to the contact info.
——————-

Edited to remove identifying details.

September 5, 2007 at 4:26 pm

concerned

Wow… thanks for posting this information.

It’s Kimmer’s version of the “Big Lie” (according to wikipedia, the Big Lie is a propaganda technique in which the lie is so complex that the public will either dismiss it as impossible or choose not to believe it out of willful ignorance).

September 5, 2007 at 4:28 pm

Mimi

Oh I just noticed Jean’s comment above … “other fund raisers “?!

More info, please!

September 5, 2007 at 4:30 pm

PhatPatty

I remember around Christmas there was some jewlery sale to benefit “her kids”…..it should be in the newsletter since she promoted it heavily at the time herself!

September 5, 2007 at 4:31 pm

Tam (Kimkins refugee)

There’s a warning in the Bible to the people of God who chose to follow their own way rather than God’s: (you can) be sure your sin will find you out!

I used to admire Kimmer when she first showed up at LCF but all I’m feeling lately is absolute disgust. What a shame.

September 5, 2007 at 4:52 pm

Mimi

Thank you Patty. This and other fund raisers definitely should be reported to Barbara Hofman at the CASA office

September 5, 2007 at 5:01 pm

selazar_weightloss

My wife and I stopped eating in restaurants and starting cooking at home. Two things immediately happened, we saved a lot of money and we gained weight! The food tasted so good that we ate more. Now we\’ve cut back on portion size and have started to…

September 5, 2007 at 5:06 pm

The Foster Care Kids Challenge, July 2006 by diet.MEDtrials.info

[...] help from the webmaster to set us up with a paypal account at the end. …article continues at Just Ducky brought to you by diet.medtrials.info and [...]

September 5, 2007 at 5:50 pm

Mimi

Ducky: selazar_weightloss is a spammer.

September 5, 2007 at 6:49 pm

Kimkins Dangers

A poster on ALC spoke with CA Children’s Services who verified that Heidi Diaz has not been paid a foster parent stipend for at least the last 7 years.

No stipend means no foster children…….

I’d hope that the Kimkins members defending her, even after the release of the pictures will finally see the light.

Lying about losing weight is one thing. Lying about foster children and accepting money on their behalf when THEY DON’T EXIST is another thing entirely.

September 5, 2007 at 9:05 pm

lovinlocarb

Actually…

Tippy was not an admin at THAT time. She just became one in the last week. Her profile was just updated with that title so that why it’s showing up in your recently retrieved screenshots.

Last summer, at the time of the challenge–there were no admins other than Kimmer and Catherine. Becky was added later, close to December and then after her no new ones were added until the explosion of growth with the WW mag release.

September 6, 2007 at 12:03 am

mariasol

Tippy Toes was not an administrator at the time of the fund raiser (July last year) but she is now. I believe she was appointed shortly after the others that were officially named in a post by Christin a few days ago.

September 7, 2007 at 2:23 am

finleysmom

I guess I am all confused….She never made any money while giving free advice (weather healthy or not) on LCF and spent LOTS of time emailing and helping others. SHE was approached to start kimkins.com. She didn’t start it herself. She spent years not making a CENT off helping others. Plus, the amount of knowledge about how the diet works is amazing. She must have lost the weight at one point… I agree that something is not right here. Anyone have any thoughts?

September 7, 2007 at 5:52 pm

Kimkins Fundraising Adventures « Kimkins Exposed

[...] Diaz, CASA, lies, foster children, Kimkins, Kimmer, children Earlier this week we reported on the Foster Kids Challenge within the Kimkins site in the summer of 2006. We also reported when Kimkins Dangers posted that [...]

September 10, 2007 at 11:02 am

Anonymous

her son’s blog says he has (had?) a foster brother that joined the army http://www.thecorruptedcanvas.com/Forum/index.php?topic=230

September 11, 2007 at 5:02 pm

Getting to Know Tippy Toes « Kimkins Exposed

[...] like to remind readers that this is the same Tippy Toes who organized the fundraiser for Kimmer’s (Heidi Diaz) phantom foster children last summer. Tippy accepted the position of Admin after revelation of the fact Heidi Diaz has no foster [...]

November 27, 2007 at 4:05 pm

Heidi’s Foster Kids Revisited « Kimkins Scam

[...] Exposed also had posts pertaining to the alleged foster children. You can find those here and [...]





Kimkins, Not Safe for Diabetics, as per TOS

4 09 2007

Kkatastrophediet posted today about the changes to the Kimkins site Terms of Service. Within the change is a notable warning,

This program should not be attempted by anyone with the following conditions without prior approval from their physician: pregnant or nursing mothers, patients with history of gout, kidney failure or disease, gallbladder issues, those under the age of 18 and those with blood glucose issues such as diabetes or hypoglycemia. The content relayed on Kimkins.com is not to be interpreted as advocating the self-management of your medical condition(s) or those of your family.

Contrast that with the promotional page ‘Thinking About Kimkins?’ that lures the unsuspecting with the following bold statement,

Is Kimkins good for diabetics? Kimkins is perfect for all diabetics!

It appears Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) will say anything to convince those reading her promotional material to sign up and pay her $60, even if it means potentially compromising the health of someone with diabetes. How shameful.

9 comments

Comments feed for this article

September 4, 2007 at 3:36 pm

Concerned about kimkins

Bla bla bla “don’t sue me.” Bla bla bla “don’t tell anyone what I told you.” Bla bla bla “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.” Wtf ever. Wow…someone is really good at slide of hand!

Don’t forget Kimmeroonie, you said it was good for diabetics on your pod cast. :)

September 4, 2007 at 3:57 pm

Kimkins Dangers

Kimmeroonie, lol.

The “safe for all diabetics” issue is one that I have been very upset with from the beginning. Now suddenly her tos is changed and if you read the entire post at the Kkatastrophe blog, you’ll see how many times it says “WE ARE NOT LIABLE FOR ANYTHING BAD THINGS THAT HAPPEN TO YOU ON THIS DIET”.

If the diet is so great, so healthy, so wonderful, why would they need to say that?

September 4, 2007 at 4:06 pm

Concerned about kimkins

Uh….let me expound….that would be because kimmeroonie is staring at the business end of a class action lawsuit. Woops!

September 4, 2007 at 4:20 pm

Healthy LCer

This is still on her home page:

And, Kimkins is the perfect diet for type 1 and 2 diabetics! Our program offers superior blood sugar control. In fact, many type 2 diabetes members get off their meds like Glucophage and Metformin!

September 4, 2007 at 4:46 pm

Laura

A disclaimer does not absolve you if you continue to make statements saying the opposite. Her promotion and terms of service/disclaimer are not aligned, thus she remains open to liability!

September 4, 2007 at 4:49 pm

ooBoo

Kimmer is way open to liability, she knows it and pretends it’s not there. I seriously hope her members initiate a class action suit soon, they have cause and should take the opportunity while the irons are hot, hot, hot!

September 4, 2007 at 4:58 pm

Concerned about kimkins

Yup and don’t forget that she’s been dumb enough to record her claims for all posterity on Jimmy’s pod cast. Good thinking! All it takes is a first year law student and someone’s out of business and refuinding all of her clients money. :) )

September 4, 2007 at 5:36 pm

LisaLC

“Yup and don’t forget that she’s been dumb enough to record her claims for all posterity on Jimmy’s pod cast. Good thinking! All it takes is a first year law student and someone’s out of business and refuinding all of her clients money. :) )”

IF that was her. How do we know? What prevents her from saying it was someone else posing as her? It was just a voice recording, after all. She has woven a tangled web, for sure. I can hardly wait until this whole thing is blown wide open.

September 5, 2007 at 3:32 am

ban kimmer

Oh trust me, if it gets to a court phase, they are going to do all they can to prove that it was her, including but not limited to finding out how Jimmy contacted her to make arrangements, what phone number was used, what email to set it up. It will be substantiated. And the SSKimmer will be sunk.





To Deni

31 08 2007

“It is a sad tendancy of modern men to either do the right thing in the wrong way or do the wrong thing in the right way. We either hold to truth obnoxiously or we hold to a lie graciously. We are either a rude angel or a polite devil. Often what poses as a cruel orthodoxy is defeated by what poses as a kind heresy” – George Grant & Mark Horne, from the book Unnatural Affections

With that in mind, we all must understand that cognitive dissonance is an innately human process that can muddle the ethical values of an individual without him or her even realizing that it is happening. The most basic of cognitive dissonance scenarios occur when a person whom an individual regards highly adopts a behavior that the same individual deplores.

The gulf between the individual’s admiration of the person (a positive attitude) and the individual’s objection to the behavior (a negative attitude) must be reconciled.

The individual can lower his or her estimation of the person, or develop a rationalization for the conflict (the person was acting uncharacteristically due to illness, stress, or confusion), or reduce the disapproval of the behavior.

This is why misbehavior by leaders and other admired role models is potentially very harmful on a large scale: by creating dissonance, it creates a downward drag on societal norms by validating unethical behavior. Tortured or inexplicable defenses of otherwise clearly wrong behavior in public dialogue are often the product of cognitive dissonance.

Remember, sin ripples; it affects the whole world.

Therefore, if a public person – by his or her pronouncements – trivializes an issue as important as health, we all must stand up and pay attention.

When someone lies to us or others, we must recognize it and accept our duty to not only abhor it, but if once a party to it, turn our backs and leave that person in their wickedness.

When someone says things which may bring harm to another, we must recognize it and accept our duty to not only abhor it, but no longer be party to such dangerous words.

As spiritual beings we’re called to account not only for what we have done, but what we failed to do.

Not only in how we see, but in how our Creator sees it.

2 Cor 5:10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive recompense, according to what he did in the body, whether good or evil.

1 Cor3:12-15 If any man builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw, his work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each man’s work. If what he has built survives, he will receive his reward. If it is burned up, he will suffer loss; he himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames.

6 comments

Comments feed for this article

August 31, 2007 at 2:40 pm

Healthy LCer

I totally agree with this 100 percent. Christin is a strong Christian and therefore will be held accountable for anything harmful that she has advised people to do. If she did this unknowingly at first, that is totally different than
hearing people’s stories of illness and continuing to give unsafe advice.

Plus, advising children/diabetics is a WHOLE other category. And approving of what Kimmer is doing is just like SHE was doing it. Scripture tells us to FLEE
from evil. That’s what Christin needs to do…

August 31, 2007 at 3:02 pm

kkatastrophediet

Mark 9.43

And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched

August 31, 2007 at 3:39 pm

ooBoo

Bravo!

Deni, please leave! You can do it! You’re strong and know what’s right and wrong and what Kimmer is doing is wrong, wrong, wrong!

August 31, 2007 at 4:29 pm

theTRUTH

Hardly a credible source for a quote: but I am reminded of the spooky words of bug-eyed Marshall Applewhite, of Heaven’s Gate cult fame…

This applies to all of the innocent Admins there:

“Your only chance to survive–leave with us.”

I am sure many of you are at least considering it. You don’t want to be in a position of association with Kimmer when the stuff hits the fan. So put on your new black and white Nikes, grab your purple handkerchiefs and hit the door before it is too late. There will be folks here and elsewhere to stand with you, to hear your stories, and help you find a new home in which you can lose weight.

At least Marshall went out with his people. Do you think Kimmer won’t have self preservation as her first priority when it all comes down. Don’t you think she will try to shift blame? That is, if her identity isn’t so well insulated that she can’t just disappear. Why else would she be so careful to lie about EVERY part of her life and has never let anyone see her?

August 31, 2007 at 7:45 pm

Laura

I really hope Deni reads this and takes it to heart. She is too sweet to have her name associated with Kimkins any more!

Deni, sweetie, please get out of there!

September 3, 2007 at 11:50 pm

theTRUTH

Deni didn’t need our convincing. I thought as much. WTG Deni and Christin!





Open Letter to Kimkins Admins & Moderators

30 08 2007

Dear Kimkins Admins and Moderators,

Step back for a moment and consider all that is now happening within Kimkins.  You’re being tracked, you’re being monitored and you’re likely being told that those you work with, your fellow moderators and admins, are talking about you behind your back.  This is Kimmer’s MO and is not a new tactic to manipulate your loyalty to try and maintain the status quo.

Step back from the diet, step back from the concept you’re loyal because you lost weight or are losing weight, and take a long hard look at all that is out there about Kimmer and the type of person she is.

Do you want to continue to associate with someone who has been shown to be a liar?

Do you want to continue to assoicate with someone who says she is a CASA when you know she’s not?

Do you want to continue to associate with someone who manipulates others with illusions of gradeur, claims of foster parenting, and taking money for ‘her kids’ when it’s very likely she no longer has foster children in her care?

Do you want to continue to associate with someone who advised a child, a young teenage girl, that she didn’t need to eat more calories if she still had body fat on her?

Do you want to continue to assoicate with someone who maintains recommendations that are contrary to the body of evidence in the scientific literature?

Do you want to continue to associate with someone who has raked in millions and is either expecting you to continue to volunteer your time or paying you a paltry salary for your time and effort?

Do you want to continue to associate with someone who has obviously used her own child to attempt to play the system and keep the fact she owns the company off the paper trail?

Do you want to associate with someone who encourages you to continue providing potentially health damaging advice to paying members?

Do you want to associate with someone who has promoted her diet with stock photo pictures and wrote success stories herself of fictional people?

Do you want to associate with someone who is known to spam the internet?

Do you want to associate with someone who has FTC violations blatantly on her website?

Do you want to associate with someone who may be defrauding social security?

Do you want to associate with someone who once proudly claimed she was judgement proof?

Do you want to associate with someone who found it funny the student loan company was frustrated because she wouldn’t pay them what she borrowed for her education?

The list goes on and on!

Many of you are contemplating your position now.

Ducky knows this.

It’s not a maybe, it’s a given considering all that is happening now.

While you can, walk away!

While you can, tell her you’re done!

While you can, take back control of your life and move on!

The diet that worked for you doesn’t matter.  In life we’re all tasked with one thing, do unto others as you’ll have done to you.  Kimmer is not the diet.  You know this.  Act on what your intuition and gut has been telling you for a long time now.

Step away.

Leave.

You will be okay without Kimmer.

No amount of money is worth what she is doing to you or others.

You know that!





Christin’s Defiance!

30 08 2007

The comments section of Becky’s recent post, Interesting Times, is quite revealing as to the disagreement with Kimmer (Heidi Diaz). Of note, Becky said in her comments,

As has been said elsewhere, I did not see eye-to-eye on everything. I have been told I have an incompatible view of Kimkins than just does not mesh. So be it.

From all of Kimmer’s posts, it is generally understood that her perspective about how to lose weight is fixed in stone and no deviation is allowed, otherwise you might as well do Atkins.This morning we’ve received a number of comments not to post, but to provide information that lead us to believe that Kimkins is crumbling from within. If anyone doubts this, they only need to look at how Christin is openly defying Kimmer in her replies today to members asking for help.

On the Ask Kimmer thread, Christin today wrote:

Everyone has to find their own balance. I understand the rush for whatever gets the weight off fastest. But, you also have to make sure that you’re taking care of your body as well. Kimmer’s fat might be higher than yours or lower than the next person because each person is different. You need to make sure that you are encorporating a healthy balance of good fats / lean proteins and enough veggies to give you some good nutrients and taking your vitamins every day. Really listen to your body and if you need to up your fat and calories a little it’s ok. But only eat when you are truly hungry and only till satisfcation. Don’t force yourself to the low cals. This will only get you discouraged and frustrated w/ your plan.

I did use K/E but I also encorporated a mix of Kimkins as well so I didn’t totally shun the vegetables. Veggies are good for you! )
Let’s face it, we didn’t get heavy by eating salad and broccoli, asparagus and tomatoes… it was the white carbs that did it to us! P So don’t be afraid of the veggies…. KE is good for getting into Ketosis fast and getting that initial loss going… But get some veggies too! ;)

This is so outside of Kimmer’s repeated reduce this, eliminate that, stop eating this, don’t eat that scolding that it’s remarkable to see. It seems Christin is indeed coming to her senses and it won’t be long until she herself departs or Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) locks her out like Becky!

6 comments

Comments feed for this article

August 30, 2007 at 6:33 pm

Healthy LCer

Let’s hope Christin wakes up and hits the road. Hopefully Becky will share with her her feelings about this. Christin is continuing to give out information that is based on her ideas. She really needs to know the science behind
lowcarbing and quote Dr. Atkins or Dr. Groves. It’s like giving out a prescription without any background. Food is medicine. This is true, especially if you are diabetic.

August 30, 2007 at 7:28 pm

ooBoo

Wow!

It really may be the start of a mutiny!

How cool is that?

August 30, 2007 at 7:30 pm

LCer

Seems like Christin is getting a conscience?

August 30, 2007 at 7:50 pm

Josh

She’s smartening up. Bad advice can be deadly and I’m sure Christin doesn’t want to hurt anyone parroting Kimmer’s advice, so she’s going to say what is a better option and healthier. It won’t be long until Kimmer locks her out. Guaranteed. No one gets away with crossing that woman.

August 30, 2007 at 8:50 pm

Kan

Christin is giving advice that directly contradicts everything that Kimmer says!! So it seems she might actually be “getting” the dangers involved? But if that’s the case…why is she continuing to work for this woman???

August 31, 2007 at 3:36 am

kkatastrophediet

Christin has always had a conscience! What kind of PR/business move would it be to ban your cover girl and PR person? Christin will leave of her own accord; I have faith!





The Meet-up That Wasn’t

30 08 2007

Earlier in the month, a meet-up was scheduled to take place on August 18, 2007 and feature Kimkins covergirl Christin as the guest of honor. It was organized by the newly appointed Event Planning & Meetings Director, Lisa Jackson. A very big to-do was made of the fact that Christin would be in attendance and all others attending would have an opportunity to meet her.

So, how did the meet-up go?

The press release says, “A recent Dallas, TX Kimkins Meet Up event held at a local venue was filled to capacity and warmly received.”

But today, almost two weeks later, no posts within Kimkins site, no posts from Christin on her blog, and nothing from those who attended. Why?

Did Christin even attend? The Meet-up page for the post-event comments does not show her as being in attendance!

We are left wondering, is Christin having doubts about her affiliation with Kimkins with all the information that is coming out?

Given the recent departure of the beloved moderator Becky, how long until others begin to jump the sinking ship called Kimkins?

The Ducky Countdown Clock has started, we wager 30 days or less for Kimkins.com to disappear and be no more.





Is Becky Banned from Kimkins?

28 08 2007

Earlier today, Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) insisted that

“Becky’s decisions are her own which is why I took offense at anyone prying for details. My last word is that Becky is not banned. It was her request to no longer be moderator. She logs in nearly every day and chooses not to post. Her reasons are her own and it’s not our business.”

However a new site, Kkatastrophediet’s Weblog, created by a Kimkins member (and perhaps a staffer with access to server logs?) insists,

It has been said that Becky is not banned.

I know different. LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE. All of you who think everyone showing dissention is a mole, it is time to wake UP.

9 comments

Comments feed for this article

August 28, 2007 at 4:50 pm

Obo

Becky is definitely banned…there is no way she’d log in (as claimed by Kimmer) and not at least reply on the thread asking if she’s okay, especially since her grandson has been sick….she knows members would worry, so she’d at least post SOMETHING.

It’s not the first time a previous staff member was banned….Cutie, Kiki….they were banned for discussing something in PRIVATE MESSAGES that Kimmer read. Talk about LOW!

August 28, 2007 at 6:45 pm

LCer

Oh course she’s banned; or her password changed so same thing. Kimmer NEVER let’s someone in disagreement with her have access to the site again….way too many ways they could make her look bad!

August 28, 2007 at 8:23 pm

Megan

Amy (Curlygirl) was a moderator too (she posts still on LCF) and she’s now gone and no longer moderating either.

Looks like Kimmer is losing lots of people at once lately – who’s next?

——————–

Our understanding is that Amy is no longer an admin, but is still a member and posting as one within the Kimkins site. Thanks for the information though! We appreciate it.

August 29, 2007 at 10:38 am

Becky (Littlebit) Update — Banned from Kimkins? » Kimkins Controversy

[...] Becky been banned? Kimmer says no . KKatastrophediet blog, the new blog from a disillusioned but still stealth Kimkins member, says [...]

August 30, 2007 at 12:21 am

anonymous

New admin to replace Becky: Gary “lasttime4me”, joined 06-01-07, lost 70 lbs so far, fitday link:
http://www.fitday.com/WebFit/PublicJournals.html?Owner=%7Elasttime4me%7E
Was offered to another member who accepted, then reconsidered, citing other obligations…
don’t really want this to be a comment, but thought you might find this interesting–seems as if anyone qualifies as a moderator now a days…feel sorry for the guy–he’s unaware of what he’s getting into….

August 30, 2007 at 2:02 pm

theTRUTH

theTRUTH shall set you free. As I said on KKatastrophediet comments: Becky is banned, locked out, whatever you want to call it. I can independently confirm this as fact; confirming Kimmer is a liar, as if you already didn’t know.

August 30, 2007 at 2:06 pm

theTRUTH

There are a LOT of new Admins as of a few days ago. Cut them some slack. They know not what they do, and are as fooled as everyone else is/was (including Becky). Just proxy’s to take hit for Kimmer. Obviously I need to stay anonymous and can’t post my thoughts on the inside.

August 30, 2007 at 2:52 pm

theTRUTH

from KKatastrophediet today:

WHO HEARS HORSES????

Becky was banned. She says: “I posted my email address on the site a few weeks ago, the first time my password quit working, in case I ever disappeared suddenly. If that cannot be found, I can always be reached here.”

Told you. Who’s the liar? Plain and simple. If she lies about this, what else does she lie about? Horses, people. Horses!

August 30, 2007 at 3:54 pm

lovinlowcarb

Becky is giving a lot of information in her comments on her blog posts…it’s obvious that Kimmer is lying, but that’s no surprise, really.





Low Carb Friends Considers Moving Kimkins to “Other Plans”

27 08 2007

In what seems like a move that defies everything the admins at Low Carb Friends has said about the Kimkins diet prominence in the Weight Loss Plans section, they’ve opened a poll with the following message from the Admin (Tom):

Although there are a lot of members discussing the Kimkins diet plan here on LCF, we want to get a feel for how many people are actually following the plan as defined by Kimmer vs. a modified version of it.

If it turns out that few people are following the official plan, we will consider dissolving the Kimkins forum threads back into the “Other Plans” forum, yet still welcome discussion about the plan there.

Please respond to this poll about your experience with the Kimkins diet plan. If you have never followed the Kimkins plan or a close variation, please do not respond to the poll.

Thank you.

The poll options include:

I follow the Kimkins plan exactly as defined by Kimmer
I follow a modified version of the Kimkins plan
I used to follow the Kimkins plan, but no longer do

If you want to see the Kimkins plan removed from the top five diets in the Weight Loss section, vote now with either “modified version” or “no longer do” the plan option!

12 comments

Comments feed for this article

August 27, 2007 at 6:55 pm

Healthy LCer

I am hopeful this will happen because I don’t think anyone really does this plan as stated at LCF’s…Most tweak with Atkins OR refeeds OR add more fat..whatever..

It should be interesting, huh?

August 27, 2007 at 7:13 pm

Fluffer Nutter

I voted (that I used to follow it but no more)

August 27, 2007 at 8:44 pm

LCer

They’re just trying to cover their butts now! They bitched, moaned and complained at anyone who suggested they remove Kimkins from the top spots, claiming that enough people did Kimkins to justify the position. Then it comes out they’re advertising to bring in Kimkinistas to their “free” site so they can up sell them Netrition stuff. Now today Kimmer is busted for lying about being a CASA and the court rep wants info from anyone who sent her money for the kids. That’s rich! Now all of a sudden LCF is thinking of moving position? CYA….nothing more than that.

August 27, 2007 at 8:45 pm

Obo

You know LCF won’t let any posts within itself link to your blog anymore? Talk about friggin’ Nazis!

August 27, 2007 at 9:27 pm

cleochatra

I didn’t see an option that reads, “Because we’re a family site, do you think we should even allow for dangerous diet plans as Kimkins at LCF?”

August 27, 2007 at 10:02 pm

concerned

My thoughts exactly, cleo.

It will be interesting to see just how far and fast LCF will be running from Kimkins when some poor soul loses their life from this diet, or when the full truth about Kimmers comes out.

It’s clearly not an IF regarding the dangers of Kimkins… with so many close calls already now… it seems very likely that someone may already have died.

August 27, 2007 at 10:40 pm

fancypants

I want to reply that I did kimkins and am still suffering the effects of it and that I wonder why today, of all days, Tom grew a semblance of a conscience.

(as if everyone doesn’t know why.)

I’m beginning to even resent the members who post at that mercenary site, knowing they’re enabling him rather than holding his feet to the fire. Some don’t realize it, but some should know better, and there are two other good places to go that deserve our support. (ALC in particular has been great about allowing members to voice their reasonable opinions and not squelching the truth about dangers of Kimkins.)

August 27, 2007 at 11:30 pm

Low Carb Friends Considers Moving Kimkins to “Other Plans” by diet.MEDtrials.info

[...] continues at Just Ducky brought to you by diet.medtrials.info and [...]

August 28, 2007 at 12:38 am

lovinlowcarb

We can probably count on one hand (maybe two) the number of people “actually” doing Kimkins.

Most are modifying it all to pieces with Atkins cycling, upping fats & calories, adding fruit or other “Kimkin no-no’s” and even some are doing full blown carb “refeeds.”

All good stuff…but none of it “Kimkins.”

So why must those members insist on clinging to the label of “Kimkins” and why give people the impression that “Kimkins must be a good plan” if it rates having it’s own forum on the largest low carb community site?

If I was LCF, I’d definitely move those threads into “other plans” and quit promoting “Kimkins” as a plan “worthy” of its own forum…it’s not.

August 28, 2007 at 4:30 am

moo

lol cleo

I think they should have defined what “kimkins as defined by kimmer” is.

i.e “original kimkins”, “PBTB” etc.

I mean so many of them say they’re doing kimkins and adamantly defend it (can you say fluffybear), but don’t comprehend ITS NOT kimkins if you tweak it.

I think the first poster to the thread makes the point.

August 28, 2007 at 2:46 pm

concerned

I also think that it needs to be stated that maybe if LCF had not enabled Kimmer/Kimkins, perhaps the “Kimmer-stein” monster would never even have developed.

This situtation didn’t happen overnight, and as much as we would like to think that it is all because of “Kimmer’s magical/charismatic powers/lies”, alot of people who should have known better had to be “lookin’ the other way”…

September 7, 2007 at 5:02 am

Happy Kimkins Loser

So many of us are doing really well on Kimkins…….our doctors are happy, our blood work is good, we feel great, nothing else has worked for us…
DUH! The weight is coming off when it DIDN’T on other low carb diets (I’m one who has “low carbed” for years without much weight loss) and for the first time, I’m down 42 pounds!

Kimkins works……and some people, like me, do very well on it and come out healthier by far than when they started it.

Please be fair. We are NOT all alike, as you know. If I had not found Kimkins, I would be “low carbing” without weight loss still.





One Week, One Day, Teen Advised to go to Mother & Doctor

24 08 2007

It took one week and one day, but finally, today, an adult member of the Kimkins site set aside the risk of being banned with no refund and did the right thing, she advised the teenager being cheered by other members, site administrators and Kimmer (Heidi Diaz) herself:

I am just worried about the low calories and extreme low fat for you at your age. I have a daughter who is 14, too, and I (and our doctor) would not want her to eat such a low calorie and low fat diet. I hope you will take the diet to your mother, father, and/or doctor and go over it with them. You need to be monitored by a doctor when you are so young and losing so much weight. You also might want to consider losing the rest of this weight more slowly and with more fat and calories.

I did not like people to tell me what to do when I was 14–I still don’t! And no one wants to have someone rain on their parade, but, but, but, I would not be able to live with myself if all I did was congratulate you on your success in self-control without pointing out the risks and suggesting that you involve your parents and doctor. Your self-control and maturity could be exercised just as well on an appropriate diet for a young woman your age.

Courage!

It takes just one person with the courage to stand up and do the right thing!

Ducky applauds you!